Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs VNQ: how they differ
IJS and VNQ hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and VNQ hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | VNQ |
|---|---|---|
| MACERICH COMPANY (THE) | 0.37% | 0.30% |
| PHILLIPS EDISON & COMPANY INC | 0.24% | 0.27% |
| ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST INC | 0.23% | 0.33% |
| TERRENO REALTY CORP | 0.23% | 0.36% |
| MILLROSE PROPERTIES INC | 0.21% | 0.25% |
| BROADSTONE NET LEASE INC | 0.32% | 0.20% |
| OUTFRONT MEDIA INC | 0.18% | 0.25% |
| TANGER INC | 0.17% | 0.23% |
| APPLE HOSPITALITY REIT INC | 0.40% | 0.16% |
| LXP INDUSTRIAL TRUST | 0.16% | 0.16% |
| SL GREEN REALTY CORP | 0.40% | 0.16% |
| NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS INC | 0.16% | 0.20% |
| Only in IJS | Only in VNQ |
|---|---|
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% | Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund 14.67% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% | Welltower Inc 7.86% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% | Prologis Inc 7.02% |
| CARMAX INC 0.82% | Equinix Inc 5.66% |
| KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77% | American Tower Corp 4.55% |
| POOL CORP 0.75% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 3.67% |
| LKQ CORP 0.73% | Simon Property Group Inc 3.54% |
| VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73% | Realty Income Corp 3.12% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | VNQ Vanguard Real Estate Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | US real estate |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +5.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −11.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 63.3% |
| Holdings | 461 | 146 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VNQ in plain words
VNQ is an index equity fund tracking the US real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 63% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 54.9%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or VNQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and VNQ returned +5.6%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or VNQ?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and VNQ charges 0.13%, so VNQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and VNQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 63% of VNQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against VNQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-VNQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources