Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs VDC: how they differ
IJS and VDC hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and VDC hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | VDC |
|---|---|---|
| LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS INC | 0.65% | 0.33% |
| CONAGRA BRANDS INC | 0.69% | 0.32% |
| UNITED NATURAL FOODS INC | 0.30% | 0.32% |
| CAMPBELL'S COMPANY (THE) | 0.48% | 0.26% |
| ANDERSONS INC (THE) | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| FLOWERS FOODS INC | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| WD-40 COMPANY | 0.15% | 0.22% |
| ENERGIZER HOLDINGS INC | 0.14% | 0.14% |
| UNIVERSAL CORP | 0.14% | 0.17% |
| SIMPLY GOOD FOODS COMPANY (THE) | 0.12% | 0.13% |
| J & J SNACK FOODS CORP | 0.12% | 0.15% |
| Only in IJS | Only in VDC |
|---|---|
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% | Walmart Inc 14.76% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% | Costco Wholesale Corp 12.04% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% | Procter & Gamble Co/The 9.27% |
| CARMAX INC 0.82% | Coca-Cola Co/The 8.72% |
| KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77% | Philip Morris International Inc 4.66% |
| POOL CORP 0.75% | PepsiCo Inc 4.30% |
| LKQ CORP 0.73% | Altria Group Inc 3.91% |
| VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73% | Mondelez International Inc 2.69% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | Consumer Staples |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +4.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −12.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 86.6% |
| Holdings | 461 | 103 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VDC in plain words
VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or VDC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and VDC returned +4.6%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or VDC?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so VDC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources