Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJS vs VB: how they differ

IJS and VB hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and VB hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJS and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJSVB
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC1.30%0.14%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC0.60%0.14%
MAXLINEAR INC0.67%0.13%
MATCH GROUP INC0.97%0.11%
RALLIANT CORP0.43%0.10%
PLEXUS CORP0.49%0.10%
GLAUKOS CORP0.28%0.10%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY0.84%0.09%
CARMAX INC0.82%0.09%
POOL CORP0.75%0.09%
QORVO INC0.30%0.09%
ARCOSA INC0.28%0.09%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJSOnly in VB
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS INC 0.70%Jabil Inc 0.49%
ICHOR HOLDINGS LTD 0.43%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
COHU INC 0.38%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
SIGNET JEWELERS LTD 0.38%Natera Inc 0.45%
GATES INDUSTRIAL CORP PLC 0.36%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD LTD 0.34%Twilio Inc 0.38%
VERSIGENT PLC 0.33%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJS and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 ValueSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+22.1%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%21.7%
Holdings4611311

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and VB returned +15.2%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJS or VB?
IJS charges 0.18% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJS and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJS against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources