Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJS vs SCHX: how they differ

IJS and SCHX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and SCHX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJS and SCHX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJSSCHX
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY0.84%0.01%
MATCH GROUP INC0.97%0.01%
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC1.30%0.01%
QORVO INC0.30%0.01%
LKQ CORP0.73%0.01%
PAYCOM SOFTWARE INC0.57%0.01%
CARMAX INC0.82%0.01%
CONAGRA BRANDS INC0.69%0.01%
EPAM SYSTEMS INC0.45%0.01%
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS INC0.65%0.01%
POOL CORP0.75%0.01%
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES INC0.68%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJSOnly in SCHX
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77%NVIDIA Corp 7.51%
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73%Apple Inc 6.71%
VICTORIA'S SECRET & COMPANY 0.72%Microsoft Corp 4.89%
ENPHASE ENERGY INC 0.71%Amazon.com Inc 3.87%
ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS INC 0.70%Alphabet Inc 3.24%
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT INC 0.67%Broadcom Inc 3.10%
MAXLINEAR INC 0.67%Alphabet Inc 2.58%
ATLANTIC UNION BANKSHARES CORP 0.66%Meta Platforms Inc 2.02%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IJS and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 ValueU.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+22.1%+16.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts−0.7 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%94.9%
Holdings461748

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or SCHX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJS or SCHX?
IJS charges 0.18% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJS and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJS against SCHX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources