Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs MAGS: how they differ
IJS and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IJS | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| CARMAX INC 0.82% | Apple Inc 4.12% |
| KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| POOL CORP 0.75% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| LKQ CORP 0.73% | Microsoft Corp 3.62% |
| VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 461 | 9 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or MAGS?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources