Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IJS vs IWF: how they differ
IJS and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IJS and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IJS | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC | 0.25% | 0.01% |
| LAZARD INC | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP | 0.22% | 0.00% |
| RINGCENTRAL INC | 0.13% | 0.00% |
| Only in IJS | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85% |
| MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% | APPLE INC. 6.72% |
| EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% | ALPHABET INC. 6.18% |
| CARMAX INC 0.82% | BROADCOM INC. 5.21% |
| KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77% | ALPHABET INC. 4.98% |
| POOL CORP 0.75% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11% |
| LKQ CORP 0.73% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86% |
| VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73% | TESLA, INC. 3.65% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.1% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +4.7 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 461 | 368 |
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IJS or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IJS or IWF?
- IJS charges 0.18% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IJS and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources