Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJS vs IJT: how they differ

IJS and IJT hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.

iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJS and IJT hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJS and IJT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJSIJT
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC0.60%0.61%
MAXLINEAR INC0.67%0.51%
RALLIANT CORP0.43%0.47%
PLEXUS CORP0.49%0.39%
MACERICH COMPANY (THE)0.37%0.41%
LUMEN TECHNOLOGIES INC0.44%0.36%
MATERION CORP0.30%0.38%
QORVO INC0.30%0.52%
ARCOSA INC0.28%0.51%
GLAUKOS CORP0.28%0.63%
RADIAN GROUP INC0.27%0.28%
WILLSCOT HOLDINGS CORP0.27%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJSOnly in IJT
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30%FormFactor, Inc. 1.38%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.97%Viasat, Inc. 1.35%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84%Argan, Inc. 1.24%
CARMAX INC 0.82%BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. 1.22%
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77%Krystal Biotech, Inc. 1.08%
POOL CORP 0.75%ESCO Technologies, Inc. 1.00%
LKQ CORP 0.73%Alkermes plc 0.97%
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73%Everus Construction Group, Inc. 0.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJS and IJT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJS
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
IJT
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P Small-Cap 600 ValueS&P Small-Cap 600 Growth
Total return, 1 year+22.1%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.7 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.18%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings461347

IJS in plain words

IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IJT in plain words

IJT is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 347 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJS or IJT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJS returned +22.1% and IJT returned +17.6%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJS or IJT?
IJS charges 0.18% a year and IJT charges 0.18%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJS and IJT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJS and 0% of IJT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJS against IJT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJS against IJT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJS-IJT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources