Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJR vs XHB: how they differ

IJR and XHB hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IJR returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and XHB hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJR and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJRXHB
MERITAGE HOMES CORP0.31%3.53%
INSTALLED BUILDING PRODUCTS INC0.29%3.49%
CHAMPION HOMES INC0.27%3.34%
CAVCO INDUSTRIES INC0.26%3.23%
M/I HOMES INC0.23%2.16%
GREEN BRICK PARTNERS INC0.13%1.00%
CENTURY COMMUNITIES INC0.10%1.30%
LGI HOMES INC0.07%1.19%
DREAM FINDERS HOMES INC0.03%0.52%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJROnly in XHB
FORMFACTOR INC 0.69%Owens Corning 4.10%
VIASAT INC 0.68%Advanced Drainage Systems Inc 3.60%
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.66%KB Home 3.56%
ARGAN INC 0.62%Builders FirstSource Inc 3.56%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.61%Toll Brothers Inc 3.52%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61%PulteGroup Inc 3.44%
MAXLINEAR INC 0.60%Masco Corp 3.41%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC 0.54%Somnigroup International Inc 3.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJR and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isS&P SmallCap 600SPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+19.9%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.4 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.35%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%45.7%
Holdings60335

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +19.9% and XHB returned −16.6%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJR or XHB?
IJR charges 0.06% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJR against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources