Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJR vs VDE: how they differ

IJR and VDE hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VDE returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and Vanguard Energy Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and VDE hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJR and VDE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJRVDE
SM ENERGY COMPANY0.33%0.33%
KODIAK GAS SERVICES INC0.41%0.32%
ARCHROCK INC0.40%0.27%
MAGNOLIA OIL & GAS CORP0.26%0.24%
LIBERTY ENERGY INC0.24%0.23%
CORE NATURAL RESOURCES INC0.22%0.22%
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES CORP0.23%0.21%
OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC0.22%0.20%
CACTUS INC0.20%0.20%
HELMERICH & PAYNE INC0.18%0.20%
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY INC0.18%0.22%
TIDEWATER INC0.17%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJROnly in VDE
FORMFACTOR INC 0.69%Exxon Mobil Corp 21.37%
VIASAT INC 0.68%Chevron Corp 14.53%
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.66%ConocoPhillips 5.79%
ARGAN INC 0.62%Williams Cos Inc/The 3.65%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.61%SLB Ltd 3.49%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61%Marathon Petroleum Corp 3.29%
MAXLINEAR INC 0.60%Valero Energy Corp 3.19%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC 0.54%EOG Resources Inc 3.06%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IJR and VDE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
VDE
Vanguard Energy Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P SmallCap 600Energy
Total return, 1 year+19.9%+50.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.4 pts+33.1 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.09%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%81.6%
Holdings603105

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VDE in plain words

VDE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 82% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 64.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or VDE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +19.9% and VDE returned +50.6%, so VDE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJR or VDE?
IJR charges 0.06% a year and VDE charges 0.09%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and VDE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 82% of VDE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJR against VDE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against VDE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-VDE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources