Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJR vs VBR: how they differ

IJR and VBR hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and IJR returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and VBR hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJR and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJRVBR
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC0.66%0.26%
VIASAT INC0.68%0.25%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC0.61%0.24%
RALLIANT CORP0.46%0.18%
PLEXUS CORP0.45%0.17%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORP0.42%0.17%
ENPRO INC0.44%0.17%
EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY0.42%0.16%
POOL CORP0.38%0.16%
QORVO INC0.41%0.16%
ARCOSA INC0.40%0.15%
JACKSON FINANCIAL INC0.16%0.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJROnly in VBR
FORMFACTOR INC 0.69%Jabil Inc 0.87%
ARGAN INC 0.62%NRG Energy Inc 0.66%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.61%Tapestry Inc 0.64%
MAXLINEAR INC 0.60%Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC 0.54%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.50%Moderna Inc 0.54%
MATCH GROUP INC 0.49%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
ALKERMES PLC 0.48%F5 Inc 0.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJR and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P SmallCap 600Small-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+19.9%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.4 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%30.5%
Holdings603840

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +19.9% and VBR returned +16.3%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJR or VBR?
IJR charges 0.06% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJR against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources