Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJR vs VB: how they differ

IJR and VB hold 19% of their weight in the same names, and IJR returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJR and VB hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJR and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJRVB
FORMFACTOR INC0.69%0.15%
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC0.66%0.14%
VIASAT INC0.68%0.14%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC0.61%0.14%
ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC0.61%0.14%
MAXLINEAR INC0.60%0.13%
ARGAN INC0.62%0.13%
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC0.54%0.13%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC0.50%0.11%
MATCH GROUP INC0.49%0.11%
EVERUS CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC0.47%0.10%
STONEX GROUP INC0.47%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJROnly in VB
ALKERMES PLC 0.48%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
GATES INDUSTRIAL CORP PLC 0.39%Jabil Inc 0.49%
KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.39%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
ULTRA CLEAN HOLDINGS INC 0.35%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
ENOVA INTERNATIONAL INC 0.33%Natera Inc 0.45%
LIQUIDIA CORP 0.31%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
NOBLE CORP PLC 0.26%Twilio Inc 0.38%
ICHOR HOLDINGS LTD 0.22%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJR and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P SmallCap 600Small-Cap
Total return, 1 year+19.9%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+2.4 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%21.7%
Holdings6031311

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJR or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJR returned +19.9% and VB returned +15.2%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJR or VB?
IJR charges 0.06% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJR and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJR and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJR against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJR against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJR-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources