Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs VONG: how they differ

IJH and VONG hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IJH returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and VONG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHVONG
EVERPURE INC0.69%0.07%
BURLINGTON STORES INC0.55%0.06%
LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP0.58%0.05%
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC0.46%0.04%
LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY0.38%0.04%
NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC0.47%0.04%
GUIDEWIRE SOFTWARE INC0.29%0.04%
DYNATRACE INC0.36%0.04%
EQUITABLE HOLDINGS INC0.33%0.04%
PENUMBRA INC0.34%0.04%
TEXAS ROADHOUSE INC0.35%0.04%
EXELIXIS INC0.38%0.03%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in VONG
MKS INC 0.83%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%Apple Inc 11.97%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%Microsoft Corp 8.98%
ATI INC 0.74%Broadcom Inc 5.78%
ILLUMINA INC 0.73%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%Tesla Inc 3.48%
WOODWARD INC 0.70%Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IJH and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P MidCap 400Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%95.6%
Holdings400387

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and VONG returned +7.2%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or VONG?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources