Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs VBR: how they differ

IJH and VBR hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and VBR returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and VBR hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHVBR
US FOODS HOLDING CORP0.62%0.48%
TD SYNNEX CORP0.55%0.41%
RELIANCE INC0.53%0.41%
EAST WEST BANCORP INC0.49%0.38%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC0.46%0.36%
PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP COMPANY0.48%0.36%
API GROUP CORP0.45%0.35%
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC0.45%0.35%
TENET HEALTHCARE CORP0.45%0.35%
W.P. CAREY INC0.44%0.34%
REGAL REXNORD CORP0.44%0.34%
TOLL BROTHERS INC0.43%0.34%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in VBR
TWILIO INC 0.86%Jabil Inc 0.87%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%NRG Energy Inc 0.66%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%Tapestry Inc 0.64%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
ATI INC 0.74%Moderna Inc 0.54%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%F5 Inc 0.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJH and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P MidCap 400Small-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.05%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%30.5%
Holdings400840

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and VBR returned +16.3%, so VBR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or VBR?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources