Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs VB: how they differ

IJH and VB hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and VB hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHVB
TWILIO INC0.86%0.38%
MKS INC0.83%0.37%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP0.85%0.35%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP0.77%0.34%
ENTEGRIS INC0.76%0.33%
ATI INC0.74%0.33%
MASTEC INC0.71%0.32%
MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS INC0.69%0.32%
WOODWARD INC0.70%0.31%
ILLUMINA INC0.73%0.31%
EVERPURE INC0.69%0.30%
STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC0.71%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in VB
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%Jabil Inc 0.49%
FABRINET 0.56%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD 0.44%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS PLC 0.42%Natera Inc 0.45%
RENAISSANCERE HOLDINGS LTD 0.37%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
SHARKNINJA INC 0.30%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%
CNH INDUSTRIAL NV 0.27%Flex Ltd 0.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJH and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isS&P MidCap 400Small-Cap
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%21.7%
Holdings4001311

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or VB?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources