Which returned more over the last year, IJH or JNK?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and JNK returned +3.3%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IJH or JNK?

IJH charges 0.05% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs JNK: how they differ

IJH and JNK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJH returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJH	Only in JNK
TWILIO INC 0.86%	1261229 BC LTD 0.64%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%	MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 0.58%
MKS INC 0.83%	ECHOSTAR CORP 0.52%
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%	PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.49%
ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%	CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP INC 0.42%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%	QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 0.41%
ATI INC 0.74%	DISH NETWORK CORP 0.41%
ILLUMINA INC 0.73%	SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IJH and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF	JNK State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	S&P MidCap 400	SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year	+13.4%	+3.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−4.1 pts	−14.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.05%	0.40%
Holdings	400	1198

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

JNK in plain words

JNK is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or JNK?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and JNK returned +3.3%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or JNK?: IJH charges 0.05% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against JNK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against JNK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IJH-JNK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources