Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs VUG: how they differ

IGM and VUG hold 60% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and VUG hold 60% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGM and VUG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGMVUG
NVIDIA Corp.7.97%12.63%
Apple, Inc.7.92%11.67%
Microsoft Corp.7.50%7.62%
Alphabet, Inc.4.45%5.76%
Broadcom, Inc.7.61%4.29%
Alphabet, Inc.3.55%4.54%
Meta Platforms, Inc.4.17%3.41%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.4.13%2.62%
Applied Materials, Inc.2.50%1.60%
Lam Research Corp.2.37%1.51%
KLA Corp.1.72%1.10%
Sandisk Corp.1.47%0.94%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGMOnly in VUG
Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%Amazon.com Inc 4.47%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%Tesla Inc 3.27%
International Business Machines Corp. 1.15%Eli Lilly & Co 2.81%
Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.94%Visa Inc 1.54%
QUALCOMM, Inc. 0.85%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.16%
Analog Devices, Inc. 0.85%Mastercard Inc 1.13%
Shopify, Inc. 0.61%GE Vernova Inc 0.89%
Salesforce, Inc. 0.56%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IGM and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
VUG
Vanguard Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isExpanded Tech SectorUS growth
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.2 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50092.0%97.4%
Holdings295147

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUG in plain words

VUG is an index equity fund tracking the US growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or VUG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and VUG returned +12.9%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or VUG?
IGM charges 0.37% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so VUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and VUG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 97% of VUG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 60% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against VUG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against VUG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-VUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources