Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs VTI: how they differ

IGM and VTI hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and VTI hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGM and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGMVTI
NVIDIA Corp.7.97%6.37%
Apple, Inc.7.92%5.88%
Microsoft Corp.7.50%3.84%
Alphabet, Inc.4.45%2.90%
Broadcom, Inc.7.61%2.48%
Alphabet, Inc.3.55%2.29%
Micron Technology, Inc.5.47%1.80%
Meta Platforms, Inc.4.17%1.71%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.4.13%1.31%
Applied Materials, Inc.2.50%0.80%
Intel Corp.2.88%0.78%
Lam Research Corp.2.37%0.75%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGMOnly in VTI
Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.94%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
Shopify, Inc. 0.61%Tesla Inc 1.64%
Accenture plc 0.33%Eli Lilly & Co 1.41%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.31%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.25%
Flex Ltd. 0.26%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.12%
TE Connectivity plc 0.26%Johnson & Johnson 0.85%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. 0.19%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.79%
Celestica, Inc. 0.18%Visa Inc 0.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IGM and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isExpanded Tech SectorUS total market
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.2 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50092.0%88.3%
Holdings2953531

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and VTI returned +17.2%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or VTI?
IGM charges 0.37% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources