Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs VOE: how they differ

IGM and VOE hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and VOE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IGM and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIGMVOE
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.0.26%1.04%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.0.26%1.04%
Electronic Arts, Inc.0.20%0.45%
ON Semiconductor Corp.0.16%0.64%
Qnity Electronics, Inc.0.15%0.30%
Roper Technologies, Inc.0.15%0.59%
NetApp, Inc.0.13%0.53%
Strategy, Inc.0.13%0.50%
Zoom Communications, Inc.0.10%0.38%
HP, Inc.0.09%0.35%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.0.08%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGMOnly in VOE
NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%Cummins Inc 1.71%
Apple, Inc. 7.92%Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
Broadcom, Inc. 7.61%Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
Microsoft Corp. 7.50%CRH PLC 1.24%
Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
Alphabet, Inc. 4.45%General Motors Co 1.21%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.17%SLB Ltd 1.21%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IGM and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isExpanded Tech SectorMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+32.7%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+15.2 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.37%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50092.0%96.6%
Holdings295170

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and VOE returned +20.2%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or VOE?
IGM charges 0.37% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IGM and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources