Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IGM vs SPYG: how they differ
IGM and SPYG hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGM and SPYG hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IGM | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. | 7.97% | 13.66% |
| Microsoft Corp. | 7.50% | 7.81% |
| Apple, Inc. | 7.92% | 5.99% |
| Broadcom, Inc. | 7.61% | 5.04% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 4.45% | 5.91% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 5.47% | 3.67% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 3.55% | 4.71% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. | 4.17% | 3.49% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 4.13% | 2.67% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 2.50% | 1.62% |
| Lam Research Corp. | 2.37% | 1.53% |
| KLA Corp. | 1.72% | 1.11% |
| Only in IGM | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| Intel Corp. 2.88% | Amazon.com Inc 3.48% |
| Texas Instruments, Inc. 1.18% | Eli Lilly & Co 2.67% |
| Western Digital Corp. 0.96% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.94% | Tesla Inc 2.07% |
| QUALCOMM, Inc. 0.85% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68% |
| Analog Devices, Inc. 0.85% | Caterpillar Inc 1.38% |
| Shopify, Inc. 0.61% | Johnson & Johnson 1.02% |
| Salesforce, Inc. 0.56% | GE Vernova Inc 0.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | Expanded Tech Sector | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +32.7% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +15.2 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.37% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 92.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 295 | 147 |
IGM in plain words
IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGM or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IGM or SPYG?
- IGM charges 0.37% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IGM and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IGM and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 58% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources