Which returned more over the last year, IGM or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IGM or IUSB?

IGM charges 0.37% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGM vs IUSB: how they differ

IGM and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGM and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGM	Only in IUSB
NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%	United States of America 0.38%
Apple, Inc. 7.92%	United States of America 0.37%
Broadcom, Inc. 7.61%	United States of America 0.37%
Microsoft Corp. 7.50%	United States of America 0.37%
Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%	United States of America 0.36%
Alphabet, Inc. 4.45%	United States of America 0.36%
Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.17%	United States of America 0.36%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IGM and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	Expanded Tech Sector	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	+32.7%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+15.2 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.37%	0.06%
Holdings	295	17819

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGM or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGM returned +32.7% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGM or IUSB?: IGM charges 0.37% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGM against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGM against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGM-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources