Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IGIB vs MOAT: how they differ
IGIB and MOAT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MOAT returned more over the year.
iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IGIB and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IGIB | Only in MOAT |
|---|---|
| META PLATFORMS INC 0.24% | Masco Corp 2.96% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 0.23% | Kenvue Inc 2.59% |
| ANHEUSER-BUSCH CO/INBEV 0.20% | Airbnb Inc 2.56% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20% | Brown-Forman Corp 2.49% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20% | Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45% |
| MARS INC 0.19% | NVIDIA Corp 2.45% |
| PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTER 0.19% | Datadog Inc 2.44% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| What it is | 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond | Morningstar Wide Moat |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.0% | +11.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.5 pts | −6.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.46% |
| Holdings | 2988 | 55 |
IGIB in plain words
IGIB is a bond fund tracking the 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IGIB or MOAT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGIB returned −1.0% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so MOAT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IGIB or MOAT?
- IGIB charges 0.04% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so IGIB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGIB against MOAT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGIB-MOAT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources