Which returned more over the last year, IGIB or MAGS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGIB returned −1.0% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IGIB or MAGS?

IGIB charges 0.04% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IGIB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGIB vs MAGS: how they differ

IGIB and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.

iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGIB and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGIB	Only in MAGS
META PLATFORMS INC 0.24%	TREASURY BILL 65.41%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.23%	Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH CO/INBEV 0.20%	NVIDIA Corp 4.15%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20%	Apple Inc 4.12%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20%	Amazon.com Inc 4.11%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.20%	Tesla Inc 4.07%
MARS INC 0.19%	Microsoft Corp 3.62%
PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTER 0.19%	Meta Platforms Inc 3.59%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IGIB and MAGS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IGIB iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Roundhill
What it is	5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond	Magnificent Seven
Total return, 1 year	−1.0%	+14.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.5 pts	−3.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.04%	0.30%
Holdings	2988	9

IGIB in plain words

IGIB is a bond fund tracking the 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MAGS in plain words

MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGIB or MAGS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGIB returned −1.0% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGIB or MAGS?: IGIB charges 0.04% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IGIB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGIB against MAGS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGIB against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IGIB-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources