Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IEMG vs VT: how they differ
IEMG and VT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEMG returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IEMG | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.31% | 0.04% |
| CREDICORP LTD. | 0.16% | 0.02% |
| America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.16% | 0.02% |
| YUM CHINA HOLDINGS, INC. | 0.11% | 0.02% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION | 0.12% | 0.01% |
| Global Unichip Corp | 0.09% | 0.01% |
| Piraeus Bank SA | 0.08% | 0.01% |
| Alteogen Inc | 0.07% | 0.01% |
| Zhongji Innolight Co Ltd | 0.08% | 0.01% |
| Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| Divi's Laboratories Ltd | 0.06% | 0.01% |
| SASOL LIMITED | 0.05% | 0.01% |
| Only in IEMG | Only in VT |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 12.52% | NVIDIA Corp 4.22% |
| SK hynix Inc. 5.83% | Apple Inc 3.53% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.38% | Microsoft Corp 2.73% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 1.83% | Amazon.com Inc 2.29% |
| MediaTek Inc. 1.42% | Alphabet Inc 2.04% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.03% | Broadcom Inc 1.74% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.79% | Alphabet Inc 1.61% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.74% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Core MSCI Emerging Markets | Total World Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +30.6% | +18.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.1 pts | +1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 55.2% |
| Holdings | 2695 | 10042 |
IEMG in plain words
IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2695 positions, with the top ten at 34.1%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VT in plain words
VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or VT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +30.6% and VT returned +18.9%, so IEMG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IEMG or VT?
- IEMG charges 0.09% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IEMG and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEMG and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEMG against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEMG-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources