Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IEMG vs MAGS: how they differ
IEMG and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEMG returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IEMG and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IEMG | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 12.52% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| SK hynix Inc. 5.83% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| Tencent Holdings Limited 2.38% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Limited 1.83% | Apple Inc 4.12% |
| MediaTek Inc. 1.42% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.03% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.79% | Microsoft Corp 3.62% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.74% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | Core MSCI Emerging Markets | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +30.6% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +13.1 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 2695 | 9 |
IEMG in plain words
IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2695 positions, with the top ten at 34.1%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEMG or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEMG returned +30.6% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so IEMG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IEMG or MAGS?
- IEMG charges 0.09% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IEMG and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEMG and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEMG against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEMG-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources