Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEFA vs XLC: how they differ

IEFA and XLC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEFA returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEFAOnly in XLC
ASML Holding N.V. 2.23%Meta Platforms Inc 19.93%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.25%Alphabet Inc 13.10%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.17%Alphabet Inc 10.44%
Novartis AG 1.11%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
Nestle S.A. 1.03%Netflix Inc 4.84%
SHELL PLC 1.03%Comcast Corp 4.71%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.90%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.84%Electronic Arts Inc 4.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IEFA and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore MSCI EAFECommunication services
Total return, 1 year+18.0%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.07%0.08%
Already in the S&P 5000.1%100.0%
Holdings263223

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2632 positions, with the top ten at 11.5%.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and XLC returned −2.0%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or XLC?
IEFA charges 0.07% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IEFA and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IEFA and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEFA against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEFA-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources