Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or VGIT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and VGIT returned −1.2%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IEFA or VGIT?

IEFA charges 0.07% a year and VGIT charges 0.03%, so VGIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEFA vs VGIT: how they differ

IEFA and VGIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEFA returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEFA	Only in VGIT
ASML Holding N.V. 2.23%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.97%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.25%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.94%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.17%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
Novartis AG 1.11%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
Nestle S.A. 1.03%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
SHELL PLC 1.03%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.90%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.84%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

IEFA and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF	VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	Core MSCI EAFE	Intermediate-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year	+18.0%	−1.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.5 pts	−18.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.07%	0.03%
Holdings	2632	103

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2632 positions, with the top ten at 11.5%.

VGIT in plain words

VGIT is a bond fund tracking the Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or VGIT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and VGIT returned −1.2%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or VGIT?: IEFA charges 0.07% a year and VGIT charges 0.03%, so VGIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEFA against VGIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against VGIT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEFA-VGIT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources