Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IEFA vs TIP: how they differ
IEFA and TIP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEFA returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares TIPS Bond ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and TIP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IEFA | Only in TIP |
|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. 2.23% | United States of America 4.10% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.25% | United States of America 4.04% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.17% | United States of America 3.63% |
| Novartis AG 1.11% | United States of America 3.44% |
| Nestle S.A. 1.03% | United States of America 3.41% |
| SHELL PLC 1.03% | United States of America 3.39% |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.90% | United States of America 3.37% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.84% | United States of America 3.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core MSCI EAFE | TIPS Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | −1.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.5 pts | −18.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | 2632 | 48 |
IEFA in plain words
IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2632 positions, with the top ten at 11.5%.
TIP in plain words
TIP is a bond fund tracking the TIPS Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or TIP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and TIP returned −1.0%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IEFA or TIP?
- IEFA charges 0.07% a year and TIP charges 0.18%, so IEFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against TIP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEFA-TIP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources