Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or SCHP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IEFA or SCHP?

IEFA charges 0.07% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IEFA vs SCHP: how they differ

IEFA and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEFA returned more over the year.

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IEFA and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IEFA	Only in SCHP
ASML Holding N.V. 2.23%	United States Treasury 4.09%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.25%	United States Treasury 4.03%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.17%	United States Treasury 4.02%
Novartis AG 1.11%	United States Treasury 3.79%
Nestle S.A. 1.03%	United States Treasury 3.62%
SHELL PLC 1.03%	United States Treasury 3.42%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.90%	United States Treasury 3.39%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.84%	United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IEFA and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF	SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	Core MSCI EAFE	US TIPS
Total return, 1 year	+18.0%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.5 pts	−18.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.07%	0.03%
Holdings	2632	48

IEFA in plain words

IEFA is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI EAFE. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2632 positions, with the top ten at 11.5%.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IEFA or SCHP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IEFA returned +18.0% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so IEFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IEFA or SCHP?: IEFA charges 0.07% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IEFA against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IEFA against SCHP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IEFA-SCHP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources