Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IDEV vs URTH: how they differ
IDEV and URTH hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and IDEV returned more over the year.
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IDEV and URTH hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | IDEV | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. | 1.95% | 0.69% |
| HSBC HOLDINGS PLC | 1.09% | 0.35% |
| ASTRAZENECA PLC | 1.02% | 0.32% |
| Novartis AG | 0.97% | 0.31% |
| ROYAL BANK OF CANADA | 0.87% | 0.29% |
| Nestle S.A. | 0.90% | 0.29% |
| SHELL PLC | 0.90% | 0.26% |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | 0.78% | 0.26% |
| BHP GROUP LIMITED | 0.70% | 0.25% |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 0.71% | 0.23% |
| COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA | 0.73% | 0.22% |
| THE TORONTO-DOMINION BANK | 0.63% | 0.21% |
| Only in IDEV | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| Ferrovial SE 0.12% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 5.64% |
| Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. 0.06% | APPLE INC. 5.04% |
| Resonac Holdings Corporation 0.06% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.50% |
| Mitsui Kinzoku Company, Limited 0.06% | AMAZON.COM, INC. 2.86% |
| THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION 0.05% | ALPHABET INC. 2.43% |
| PLS GROUP LIMITED 0.05% | BROADCOM INC. 2.21% |
| ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD 0.04% | ALPHABET INC. 2.01% |
| DIPLOMA PLC 0.04% | META PLATFORMS, INC. 1.51% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core MSCI International Developed Markets | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.2 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.1% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 2268 | 1322 |
IDEV in plain words
IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2268 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IDEV or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IDEV returned +18.7% and URTH returned +17.4%, so IDEV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IDEV or URTH?
- IDEV charges 0.04% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do IDEV and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IDEV and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDEV against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IDEV-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources