Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBB vs XBI: how they differ

IBB and XBI hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned more over the year.

iShares Biotechnology ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBB and XBI hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IBB and XBI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIBBXBI
Moderna, Inc.1.99%1.41%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.2.78%1.21%
Natera, Inc.2.89%1.17%
Insmed, Inc.1.79%1.08%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.8.09%1.06%
Biogen, Inc.2.47%1.03%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1.00%1.00%
Incyte Corp.1.75%1.00%
Amgen, Inc.7.84%1.00%
Bridgebio Pharma, Inc.0.98%1.03%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.1.30%0.97%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.6.85%0.97%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IBBOnly in XBI
Argenx SE 3.76%Viking Therapeutics Inc 1.31%
Illumina, Inc. 2.07%SELLAS Life Sciences Group Inc 1.19%
BeOne Medicines Ltd. 1.77%Dianthus Therapeutics Inc 1.19%
Roivant Sciences Ltd. 1.43%Roivant Sciences Ltd 1.16%
Ascendis Pharma A/S 1.29%Alkermes PLC 1.11%
Genmab A/S 1.12%Celcuity Inc 1.10%
Medpace Holdings, Inc. 0.95%TG Therapeutics Inc 1.09%
Bio-Techne Corp. 0.86%AbbVie Inc 1.04%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IBB and XBI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
iShares Biotechnology ETF
XBI
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isBiotechnologySPDR S&P Biotech
Total return, 1 year+41.5%+64.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+24.0 pts+46.5 pts
Expense ratio0.44%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50035.6%8.5%
Holdings248150

IBB in plain words

IBB is an index equity fund tracking the Biotechnology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +41.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 36% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 248 positions, with the top ten at 44.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XBI in plain words

XBI is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Biotech. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +64.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 8% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 13.3%. It sat 9.6% below its high of Feb 8, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBB or XBI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +41.5% and XBI returned +64.0%, so XBI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IBB or XBI?
IBB charges 0.44% a year and XBI charges 0.35%, so XBI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IBB and XBI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 36% of IBB and 8% of XBI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBB against XBI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBB against XBI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IBB-XBI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources