Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBB vs VB: how they differ

IBB and VB hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and IBB returned more over the year.

iShares Biotechnology ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBB and VB hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IBB and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIBBVB
Revolution Medicines, Inc.2.78%0.46%
Natera, Inc.2.89%0.45%
Illumina, Inc.2.07%0.31%
Moderna, Inc.1.99%0.30%
United Therapeutics Corp.1.74%0.28%
Incyte Corp.1.75%0.23%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.1.30%0.21%
Bridgebio Pharma, Inc.0.98%0.16%
Exelixis, Inc.1.03%0.16%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.1.00%0.15%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.0.95%0.15%
Cytokinetics, Inc.0.79%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IBBOnly in VB
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 8.09%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Amgen, Inc. 7.84%Jabil Inc 0.49%
Gilead Sciences, Inc. 6.85%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 4.91%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
Argenx SE 3.76%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 3.12%NRG Energy Inc 0.38%
Biogen, Inc. 2.47%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%
BeOne Medicines Ltd. 1.77%Flex Ltd 0.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IBB and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
iShares Biotechnology ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isBiotechnologySmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+41.5%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+24.0 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.44%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50035.6%21.7%
Holdings2481311

IBB in plain words

IBB is an index equity fund tracking the Biotechnology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +41.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 36% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 248 positions, with the top ten at 44.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBB or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +41.5% and VB returned +15.2%, so IBB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IBB or VB?
IBB charges 0.44% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IBB and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 36% of IBB and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBB against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBB against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IBB-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources