Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBB vs USMV: how they differ

IBB and USMV hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and IBB returned more over the year.

iShares Biotechnology ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBB and USMV hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IBB and USMV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIBBUSMV
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.8.09%1.36%
Gilead Sciences, Inc.6.85%0.82%
Incyte Corp.1.75%0.54%
Amgen, Inc.7.84%0.31%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.3.12%0.31%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.1.30%0.31%
United Therapeutics Corp.1.74%0.21%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.4.91%0.07%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IBBOnly in USMV
Argenx SE 3.76%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%
Natera, Inc. 2.89%NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%
Revolution Medicines, Inc. 2.78%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%
Biogen, Inc. 2.47%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%
Illumina, Inc. 2.07%DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%
Moderna, Inc. 1.99%THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%
Insmed, Inc. 1.79%AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%
BeOne Medicines Ltd. 1.77%Chubb Limited 1.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

IBB and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
iShares Biotechnology ETF
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isBiotechnologyMSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year+41.5%+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+24.0 pts−10.9 pts
Expense ratio0.44%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50035.6%94.8%
Holdings248170

IBB in plain words

IBB is an index equity fund tracking the Biotechnology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +41.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 36% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 248 positions, with the top ten at 44.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBB or USMV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +41.5% and USMV returned +6.6%, so IBB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IBB or USMV?
IBB charges 0.44% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so USMV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IBB and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 36% of IBB and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBB against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBB against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IBB-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources