Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IBB vs MDY: how they differ

IBB and MDY hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and IBB returned more over the year.

iShares Biotechnology ETF and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IBB and MDY hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IBB and MDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIBBMDY
Illumina, Inc.2.07%0.73%
United Therapeutics Corp.1.74%0.64%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.1.30%0.47%
Exelixis, Inc.1.03%0.38%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.0.95%0.33%
Cytokinetics, Inc.0.79%0.32%
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0.84%0.32%
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.0.85%0.30%
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.0.72%0.26%
Repligen Corp.0.57%0.20%
Bruker Corp.0.52%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IBBOnly in MDY
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 8.09%TWILIO INC 0.86%
Amgen, Inc. 7.84%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
Gilead Sciences, Inc. 6.85%MKS INC 0.83%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 4.91%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
Argenx SE 3.76%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 3.12%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
Natera, Inc. 2.89%ATI INC 0.74%
Revolution Medicines, Inc. 2.78%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

IBB and MDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IBB
iShares Biotechnology ETF
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isBiotechnologyS&P MidCap 400, book from IJH
Total return, 1 year+41.5%+13.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+24.0 pts−4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.44%0.23%
Already in the S&P 50035.6%0.0%
Holdings248400

IBB in plain words

IBB is an index equity fund tracking the Biotechnology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +41.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 36% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 248 positions, with the top ten at 44.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IBB or MDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IBB returned +41.5% and MDY returned +13.0%, so IBB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IBB or MDY?
IBB charges 0.44% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so MDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IBB and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 36% of IBB and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IBB against MDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IBB against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IBB-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources