Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IAU vs VGSH: how they differ
IAU is a commodity fund and VGSH a bond index fund, and over the year IAU returned more, +19.2% against +1.8%.
iShares Gold Trust and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund.
| IAU iShares Gold Trust | VGSH Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Gold | Short-Term Treasury |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.2% | +1.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.7 pts | −15.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | not filed | 91 |
IAU in plain words
IAU is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VGSH in plain words
VGSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IAU or VGSH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IAU returned +19.2% and VGSH returned +1.8%, so IAU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IAU or VGSH?
- IAU charges 0.25% a year and VGSH charges 0.03%, so VGSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IAU against VGSH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IAU-VGSH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources