Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
IAU vs VBIL: how they differ
IAU is a commodity fund and VBIL a short-term Treasury fund, and over the year IAU returned more, +19.2% against +3.8%.
iShares Gold Trust and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF.
| IAU iShares Gold Trust | VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | Gold | 0-3 Month Treasury Bill |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.2% | +3.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +1.7 pts | −13.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | not filed | 26 |
IAU in plain words
IAU is a commodity fund tracking the Gold. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. It sat 19.6% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VBIL in plain words
VBIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 Month Treasury Bill. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IAU or VBIL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IAU returned +19.2% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so IAU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, IAU or VBIL?
- IAU charges 0.25% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so VBIL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IAU against VBIL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/IAU-VBIL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources