Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HYMB vs MUB: how they differ

HYMB and MUB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and HYMB returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HYMB and MUB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HYMB and MUB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHYMBMUB
City of Chicago IL0.12%0.10%
County of Jefferson AL Sewer Revenue0.17%0.08%
Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District0.10%0.05%
Long Island Power Authority0.09%0.05%
District of Columbia0.04%0.11%
City of Chicago IL0.17%0.04%
Lower Colorado River Authority0.07%0.03%
New Jersey Turnpike Authority0.03%0.05%
South Carolina Public Service Authority0.03%0.03%
County of Jefferson AL Sewer Revenue0.18%0.03%
North Carolina Turnpike Authority0.32%0.03%
Metropolitan Transportation Authority0.05%0.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HYMBOnly in MUB
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sal 2.53%Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sal 1.54%New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Aut 1.27%New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 0.64%Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp Sal 0.62%Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 0.55%Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
New York Liberty Development Corp 0.47%State of New Jersey 0.13%
Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority 0.43%State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

HYMB and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HYMB
State Street(R) SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetiShares
What it isSPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal BondNational Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year+1.7%+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−15.8 pts−17.4 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.05%
Holdings18676603

HYMB in plain words

HYMB is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or MUB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned +1.7% and MUB returned +0.1%, so HYMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HYMB or MUB?
HYMB charges 0.35% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HYMB against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYMB against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HYMB-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources