Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HYMB vs IWC: how they differ
HYMB is a bond index fund and IWC an equity index fund, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against +1.7%.
State Street(R) SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF and iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
| HYMB State Street(R) SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | iShares |
| What it is | SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond | Russell Microcap |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.7% | +31.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −15.8 pts | +13.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | not published |
| Holdings | 1867 | not filed |
HYMB in plain words
HYMB is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HYMB or IWC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HYMB returned +1.7% and IWC returned +31.3%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HYMB against IWC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HYMB-IWC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources