Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HGER vs NOBL: how they differ

HGER and NOBL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HGER returned more over the year.

Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HGER and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HGEROnly in NOBL
United States Treasury 17.98%Nucor Corp. 1.77%
United States Treasury 17.65%West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73%
United States Treasury 17.49%International Business Machines Corp. 1.71%
United States Treasury 16.56%Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68%
United States Treasury 13.97%Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%
United States Treasury 12.50%Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62%
United States Treasury 3.85%Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

HGER and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerHarborProShares
What it isHarbor Commodity All-Weather StrategyS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year+52.8%+9.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+35.3 pts−8.1 pts
Expense ratio0.68%0.35%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%100.0%
Holdings769

HGER in plain words

HGER is an index equity fund tracking the Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +52.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.68% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 7 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HGER or NOBL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HGER returned +52.8% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so HGER returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HGER or NOBL?
HGER charges 0.68% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HGER and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of HGER and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HGER against NOBL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HGER against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HGER-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources