Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs XLU: how they differ

HDV and XLU hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and XLU hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and XLU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVXLU
DUKE ENERGY CORP1.57%6.97%
SOUTHERN COMPANY (THE)1.55%7.62%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC0.98%5.26%
ENTERGY CORP0.62%3.71%
WEC ENERGY GROUP INC0.59%2.69%
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC0.59%2.86%
DTE ENERGY COMPANY0.47%2.24%
FIRSTENERGY CORP0.41%1.75%
AMEREN CORP0.38%2.21%
PPL CORP0.36%1.93%
CMS ENERGY CORP0.33%1.67%
EVERGY INC0.31%1.41%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in XLU
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%NextEra Energy Inc 12.93%
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%Constellation Energy Corp 5.61%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%Sempra 4.28%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%Dominion Energy Inc 4.24%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%Vistra Corp 3.55%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%Xcel Energy Inc 3.54%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%Exelon Corp 3.37%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 3.88%Consolidated Edison Inc 2.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

HDV and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
XLU
State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isCore High DividendUtilities
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+2.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts−15.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%100.0%
Holdings7531

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

XLU in plain words

XLU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%. It sat 10.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or XLU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and XLU returned +2.4%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or XLU?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and XLU charges 0.08%, so HDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and XLU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 100% of XLU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against XLU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against XLU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-XLU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources