Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs VXF: how they differ

HDV and VXF hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and VXF hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and VXF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVVXF
WATSCO INC0.23%0.17%
DT MIDSTREAM INC0.16%0.18%
OGE ENERGY CORP0.17%0.12%
IDACORP INC0.09%0.10%
ANTERO MIDSTREAM CORP0.13%0.09%
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY0.09%0.09%
INGREDION INC0.10%0.07%
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY0.11%0.07%
NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP0.09%0.07%
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO INC0.08%0.06%
MGIC INVESTMENT CORP0.06%0.07%
MOELIS & COMPANY0.07%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in VXF
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%Space Exploration Technologies Corp 1.19%
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%Snowflake Inc 1.03%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%Bloom Energy Corp 0.93%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%Cloudflare Inc 0.92%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%Astera Labs Inc 0.76%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%Rocket Lab Corp 0.61%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%Cheniere Energy Inc 0.59%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 3.88%Ferguson Enterprises Inc 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

HDV and VXF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore High DividendExtended Market
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+14.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts−3.4 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%0.0%
Holdings753365

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

VXF in plain words

VXF is an index equity fund tracking the Extended Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3365 positions, with the top ten at 7.6%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or VXF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and VXF returned +14.1%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or VXF?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and VXF charges 0.05%, so VXF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and VXF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 0% of VXF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against VXF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against VXF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-VXF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources