Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs VONG: how they differ

HDV and VONG hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and VONG hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVVONG
ABBVIE INC5.45%1.16%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)4.08%0.73%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)3.88%0.45%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC3.55%0.34%
BLACKSTONE INC2.43%0.26%
QUALCOMM INC2.38%0.18%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY0.74%0.10%
PEPSICO INC3.67%0.08%
ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC0.83%0.07%
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC0.34%0.07%
SYSCO CORP0.44%0.06%
STARBUCKS CORP1.43%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in VONG
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%NVIDIA Corp 13.09%
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%Apple Inc 11.97%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%Microsoft Corp 8.98%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%Broadcom Inc 5.78%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 3.78%Alphabet Inc 3.91%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 3.71%Tesla Inc 3.48%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 2.14%Meta Platforms Inc 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

HDV and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore High DividendRussell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%95.6%
Holdings75387

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and VONG returned +7.2%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or VONG?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources