Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs VO: how they differ

HDV and VO hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and VO hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVVO
SLB LTD1.01%0.67%
ENTERGY CORP0.62%0.53%
WILLIAMS COMPANIES INC (THE)1.22%0.44%
PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INC0.59%0.39%
SYSCO CORP0.44%0.39%
WEC ENERGY GROUP INC0.59%0.37%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC0.98%0.36%
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP0.77%0.35%
M&T BANK CORP0.47%0.34%
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC0.84%0.32%
PAYCHEX INC0.63%0.31%
AMEREN CORP0.38%0.30%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in VO
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%Cummins Inc 0.95%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%Datadog Inc 0.84%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 3.88%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

HDV and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore High DividendMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%91.4%
Holdings75282

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and VO returned +12.0%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or VO?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources