Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs VDC: how they differ

HDV and VDC hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and VDC hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and VDC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVVDC
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)4.47%9.27%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC4.18%4.66%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)3.88%8.72%
ALTRIA GROUP INC3.71%3.91%
PEPSICO INC3.67%4.30%
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC1.31%2.69%
KIMBERLY CLARK CORP0.77%1.01%
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY0.74%2.37%
SYSCO CORP0.44%1.30%
HERSHEY COMPANY (THE)0.34%1.06%
CLOROX COMPANY0.25%0.47%
MCCORMICK & CO. INC0.18%0.46%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in VDC
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%Walmart Inc 14.76%
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%Costco Wholesale Corp 12.04%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%Monster Beverage Corp 2.24%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%Target Corp 2.03%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 1.41%
PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE) 3.80%Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 1.41%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 3.78%Kroger Co/The 1.39%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 3.55%Kenvue Inc 1.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

HDV and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore High DividendConsumer Staples
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts−12.9 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%86.6%
Holdings75103

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or VDC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and VDC returned +4.6%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or VDC?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so HDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 24% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources