Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs VBR: how they differ

HDV and VBR hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and VBR hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and VBR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVVBR
EVERGY INC0.31%0.41%
CLOROX COMPANY0.25%0.25%
NISOURCE INC0.28%0.24%
ALLIANT ENERGY CORP0.27%0.21%
HASBRO INC0.18%0.25%
OGE ENERGY CORP0.17%0.22%
DT MIDSTREAM INC0.16%0.32%
MCCORMICK & CO. INC0.18%0.14%
ANTERO MIDSTREAM CORP0.13%0.16%
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY0.11%0.13%
INGREDION INC0.10%0.13%
IDACORP INC0.09%0.18%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in VBR
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%Jabil Inc 0.87%
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%NRG Energy Inc 0.66%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%Tapestry Inc 0.64%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%Atmos Energy Corp 0.62%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%Moderna Inc 0.54%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 3.88%F5 Inc 0.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

HDV and VBR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isCore High DividendSmall-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+16.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%30.5%
Holdings75840

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

VBR in plain words

VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or VBR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and VBR returned +16.3%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or VBR?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against VBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources