Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs SCHD: how they differ

HDV and SCHD hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and SCHD hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVSCHD
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)3.88%3.96%
CHEVRON CORP6.45%3.84%
MERCK & COMPANY INC3.78%3.87%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)4.47%3.55%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC3.55%5.92%
PEPSICO INC3.67%3.45%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE)4.08%3.37%
ALTRIA GROUP INC3.71%2.94%
QUALCOMM INC2.38%6.75%
BLACKSTONE INC2.43%2.21%
CONOCOPHILLIPS2.14%3.52%
EOG RESOURCES INC1.14%1.82%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in SCHD
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%Verizon Communications Inc 3.66%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%Amgen Inc 3.48%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%Abbott Laboratories 2.97%
PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE) 3.80%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.94%
US BANCORP 1.69%Accenture PLC 2.90%
ACCENTURE PLC 1.65%Lockheed Martin Corp 2.71%
DUKE ENERGY CORP 1.57%Automatic Data Processing Inc 2.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

HDV and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isCore High DividendUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+27.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%95.1%
Holdings7599

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or SCHD?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 41% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against SCHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-SCHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources