Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs MTUM: how they differ

HDV and MTUM hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and MTUM hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and MTUM both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVMTUM
JOHNSON & JOHNSON5.70%3.76%
EXXON MOBIL CORP8.45%3.44%
ENTERGY CORP0.62%0.58%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY INC0.98%0.17%
NISOURCE INC0.28%0.15%
ALLIANT ENERGY CORP0.27%0.10%
AMEREN CORP0.38%0.06%
EVERGY INC0.31%0.05%
WEC ENERGY GROUP INC0.59%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in MTUM
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 5.57%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%BROADCOM INC. 5.41%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%NVIDIA CORPORATION 4.65%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%INTEL CORPORATION 3.84%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 3.88%LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62%
PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE) 3.80%CATERPILLAR INC. 3.21%
MERCK & COMPANY INC 3.78%ALPHABET INC. 2.95%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

HDV and MTUM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore High DividendMSCI USA Momentum Factor
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+21.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts+4.3 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%98.2%
Holdings75125

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

MTUM in plain words

MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or MTUM?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or MTUM?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so HDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against MTUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against MTUM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-MTUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources