Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HDV vs MAGS: how they differ
HDV and MAGS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.
iShares Core High Dividend ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HDV and MAGS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HDV | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| CHEVRON CORP 6.45% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70% | NVIDIA Corp 4.15% |
| ABBVIE INC 5.45% | Apple Inc 4.12% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08% | Microsoft Corp 3.62% |
| COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 3.88% | Meta Platforms Inc 3.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | Core High Dividend | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.5% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.0 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.0% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 75 | 9 |
HDV in plain words
HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HDV or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, HDV or MAGS?
- HDV charges 0.08% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so HDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do HDV and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources