Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs IWD: how they differ

HDV and IWD hold 16% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and IWD hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and IWD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVIWD
JOHNSON & JOHNSON5.70%1.72%
EXXON MOBIL CORP8.45%1.60%
ABBVIE INC5.45%1.15%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE)4.47%0.96%
MERCK & COMPANY INC3.78%0.89%
CHEVRON CORP6.45%0.86%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC4.18%0.79%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE)3.88%0.79%
QUALCOMM INC2.38%0.55%
PEPSICO INC3.67%0.46%
PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE)3.80%0.36%
CONOCOPHILLIPS2.14%0.36%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in IWD
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 3.55%AMAZON.COM, INC. 5.95%
ACCENTURE PLC 1.65%APPLE INC. 5.38%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.55%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3.89%
COTERRA ENERGY INC 0.37%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.62%
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC 0.34%JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.46%
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 0.11%INTEL CORPORATION 1.72%
NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP 0.09%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.30%
ONE GAS INC 0.08%WALMART INC. 1.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

HDV and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore High DividendRussell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+27.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts+9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%90.2%
Holdings75870

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or IWD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and IWD returned +27.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or IWD?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so HDV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 16% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against IWD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against IWD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-IWD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources