Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
HDV vs IWC: how they differ
HDV and IWC are both equity index funds, and over the year IWC returned more, +31.3% against +22.5%.
iShares Core High Dividend ETF and iShares Micro-Cap ETF.
| HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | Core High Dividend | Russell Microcap |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.5% | +31.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.0 pts | +13.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | not published |
| Holdings | 75 | not filed |
HDV in plain words
HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.
IWC in plain words
IWC is an index equity fund tracking the Russell Microcap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, HDV or IWC?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and IWC returned +31.3%, so IWC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against IWC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-IWC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources