Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

HDV vs IJH: how they differ

HDV and IJH hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and HDV returned more over the year.

iShares Core High Dividend ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, HDV and IJH hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions HDV and IJH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingHDVIJH
WATSCO INC0.23%0.40%
OGE ENERGY CORP0.17%0.28%
DT MIDSTREAM INC0.16%0.41%
ANTERO MIDSTREAM CORP0.13%0.21%
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY0.11%0.17%
INGREDION INC0.10%0.17%
IDACORP INC0.09%0.23%
NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP0.09%0.16%
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY0.09%0.20%
MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO INC0.08%0.15%
ONE GAS INC0.08%0.13%
MGIC INVESTMENT CORP0.06%0.17%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in HDVOnly in IJH
EXXON MOBIL CORP 8.45%TWILIO INC 0.86%
CHEVRON CORP 6.45%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 5.70%MKS INC 0.83%
ABBVIE INC 5.45%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (THE) 4.47%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 4.18%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
HOME DEPOT INC (THE) 4.08%ATI INC 0.74%
COCA-COLA COMPANY (THE) 3.88%ILLUMINA INC 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

HDV and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore High DividendS&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+13.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.0 pts−4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50098.0%0.0%
Holdings75400

HDV in plain words

HDV is an index equity fund tracking the Core High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 75 positions, with the top ten at 50.2%.

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, HDV or IJH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, HDV returned +22.5% and IJH returned +13.4%, so HDV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, HDV or IJH?
HDV charges 0.08% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do HDV and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of HDV and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HDV against IJH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HDV against IJH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/HDV-IJH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources